guardianship conservatorship attorneys and lawyers guardianship conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys
Guardianship & Conservatorship Attorneys / Lawyers
Click on a state below to find a list of Guardianship Conservatorship Attorneys / Lawyers practicing in that state.
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

Alabama - In accordance with Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.2(e) (1997) - No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed by the attorneys listed in this directory is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Alaska - In accordance with Alaska Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4(a)(2) (1998) - The Alaska Bar Association does not accredit or endorse certifying organizations.
Florida - In accordance with Florida Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 4-7.2(d) (1997) - The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask the attorneys listed in this directory to send you free written information about their qualifications and experience.
Hawaii - In accordance with Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4(c) (1997) - There is no procedure for review or approval of specialist certification organizations in Hawaii.
Illinois - In accordance with Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4(c)(2) (1997) - The Supreme Court of Illinois does not recognize certifications of specialties in the practice of law and that the certificate, award or recognition is not a requirement to practice law in Illinois.
Iowa - In accordance with Iowa Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-101(A), DR 2-101(C), DR 2-105(A)(3)(c) (1997) - The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. This disclosure is required by rule of the Supreme Court of Iowa. Memberships and offices in legal fraternities and legal societies, technical and professional licenses, and memberships in scientific, technical and professional associations and societies of law or field of practice do not mean that a lawyer is a specialist or expert in a field of law, nor do they mean that such a lawyer is necessarily any more expert or competent than any other lawyer. A description or indication of limitation of practice does not mean that any agency or board has certified such lawyer as a specialist or expert in an indicated field of law practice, nor does it mean that such lawyer is necessarily any more expert or competent than any other lawyer. All potential clients are urged to make their own independent investigation and evaluation of any lawyer being considered. This notice is required by rule of the Supreme Court of Iowa.
Massachusetts - In accordance with Massachusetts Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-105(B) (1997) - If a Massachusetts lawyer holds himself or herself out as "certified" in a particular service, field or area of law by a non-governmental body, the certifying organization is a private organization, whose standards for certification are not regulated by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
Mississippi - In accordance with Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.2(d), Rule 7.4(a), Rule 7.6(a) (1997) - The Mississippi Supreme Court advises that a decision on legal services is important and should not be based solely on advertisements. Free Background information is available upon request to a Mississippi attorney. The listing of any area of practice by a Mississippi attorney does not indicate any certification of expertise therein.
Missouri - In accordance with Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4 (1997) - Neither the Supreme Court of Missouri nor the Missouri Bar reviews or approves certifying organizations or specialist designations.
Nevada - In accordance with Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 198 (1997) - Neither the state bar of Nevada nor any agency of the State Bar has certified any lawyer identified here as a specialist or as an expert. Anyone considering a lawyer should independently investigate the lawyer's credentials and ability.
New Jersey - In accordance with New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4(b) (1997) - Any certification as a specialist, or any certification in a field of practice, that does not state that such certification has been granted by the Supreme Court of New Jersey or by an organization that has been approved by the American Bar Association, indicates that the certifying organization has not been approved, or has been denied approval, by the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the American Bar Association.
New Mexico - In accordance with New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 16-704(D) (1997) - Any certification by an organization other than the New Mexico Board of Legal Specialization does not constitute recognition by the New Mexico Board of Legal Specialization, unless the lawyer is also recognized by the board as a specialist in that area of law.
Rhode Island - In accordance with Rhode Island Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.4 (1998) - The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law. The court does not license or certify any lawyer as an expert or specialist in any field of practice.
Tennessee - In accordance with Tennessee Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-101(C)(3) (1998) - Unless otherwise indicated, Tennessee attorneys are not certified as specialists by the Tennessee Commission on Continuing Legal Education and Specialization in the areas of practice listed on their profiles.
Texas - In accordance with Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.04(b)(3) (1999) - Unless otherwise indicated, Texas attorneys are Not Certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization in the areas of practice listed on their profiles.
Washington - In accordance with Washington Rules of Professional Responsibility Rule 7.4(b) (1997) - The Supreme Court of Washington does not recognize certification of specialties in the practice of law. Any certificate, award, or recognition by a group, organization or association used by a Washington attorney to describe his or her qualifications as a lawyer or qualifications in any subspecialty of law is not a requirement to practice law in the State of Washington.
Wyoming - In accordance with Wyoming Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law Rule 7.4 (1997) - The Wyoming State Bar does not certify any lawyer as a specialist or expert. Anyone considering a lawyer should independently investigate the lawyer's credentials and ability, and not rely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise.
Home Page

Specialty Descriptions -
A brief description of each law specialty.




Resources - Helpful resources and links.





























































Alabama
Alabama Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Alaska
Alaska Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Arizona
Arizona Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Arkansas
Arkansas Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
California
California Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Colorado
Colorado Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Connecticut
Connecticut Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Delaware
Delaware Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
District of Columbia
District of Columbia Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Florida
Florida Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Georgia
Georgia Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Hawaii
Hawaii Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Idaho
Idaho Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Illinois
Illinois Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Indiana
Indiana Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Iowa
Iowa Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Kansas
Kansas Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Kentucky
Kentucky Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Louisiana
Louisiana Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Maine
Maine Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Maryland
Maryland Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Massachusetts
Massachusetts Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Michigan
Michigan Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Minnesota
Minnesota Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Mississippi
Mississippi Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Missouri
Missouri Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Montana
Montana Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Nebraska
Nebraska Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Nevada
Nevada Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
New Hampshire
New Hampshire Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
New Jersey
New Jersey Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
New Mexico
New Mexico Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
New York
New York Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
North Carolina
North Carolina Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
North Dakota
North Dakota Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Ohio
Ohio Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Oklahoma
Oklahoma Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Oregon
Oregon Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Rhode Island
Rhode Island Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
South Carolina
South Carolina Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
South Dakota
South Dakota Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Tennessee
Tennessee Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Texas
Carl J. Selesky
Selesky Law Firm
6303 Beverly Hill, #1000
Houston, TX 77057
(713)780-9595

    Visit Web Site
The practice of Houston Family Law, requires a firm that is familiar with both the complexities of family law and the courts in which your family law issue will be addressed. We specialize in family law matters in Houston and surrounding areas. Our goal is to provide legal guidance and representation to establish and maintain strong, lasting client relationships. Service to clients is the basis for our practice; and communication is the focus. Our website has been designed to provide you with enough information to determine if my practice can be of service to you. Call (713) 780-9595 for a FREE initial consultation.
Please mention SearchanAttorney.com when contacting this Houston Texas Attorney

Texas Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Utah
Utah Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Vermont
Vermont Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Virginia
Virginia Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Washington
Washington Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
West Virginia
West Virginia Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Wisconsin
Wisconsin Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers
Wyoming
Wyoming Guardianship Conservatorship attorneys and lawyers